Skip to content
Trending
June 12, 2025U.S. budget deficit hit $316 billion in May, with annual shortfall up 14% from a year ago March 23, 2025‘Some more banana skins in front of us’: Why investors may want to increase exposure to bonds April 5, 2025Medicare, Medicaid agency cuts jobs from minority health office, other divisions, as RFK Jr. guts U.S. health department April 10, 2025European Union to put countermeasures to U.S. tariffs on hold for 90 days May 7, 2025Consumer outlook hits lowest since 2011 as tariff fears mount, Conference Board survey shows April 26, 2025More Americans are financing groceries with buy now, pay later loans — and more are paying those bills late, survey says October 3, 2025Chicago Fed President Goolsbee ‘a little wary’ about cutting interest rates too quickly June 15, 2025UK Finance Minister Rachel Reeves’ spending plans risk creating ‘a snowball effect’ that pushes borrowing costs higher July 31, 2025JPMorgan marks 1,000th branch opening since 2018 expansion plans July 14, 2025Alibaba-backed Moonshot releases new Kimi AI model that beats ChatGPT, Claude in coding — and it costs less
  Sunday 7 December 2025
everydayread.net
  • HOME
  • Bitcoin
  • Business
  • Earnings
  • Economy
  • Finance
everydayread.net
everydayread.net
  • HOME
  • Bitcoin
  • Business
  • Earnings
  • Economy
  • Finance
everydayread.net
  Economy  Job growth revised down by 911,000 through March, signaling economy on shakier footing than realized
Economy

Job growth revised down by 911,000 through March, signaling economy on shakier footing than realized

AdminAdmin—September 9, 20250

The labor market created far fewer jobs than previously thought, according to a Labor Department report Tuesday that added to concerns both about the health of the economy and the state of data collection.

Annual revisions to nonfarm payrolls data for the year prior to March 2025 showed a drop of 911,000 from the initial estimates, according to a preliminary report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The total revision was on the high end of Wall Street expectations, which ranged from a low around 600,000 to as many as a million.

The revisions were more than 50% higher than last year’s adjustment and the largest on record going back to 2002. On a monthly basis, they suggest average job growth of 76,000 less than initially reported.

The numbers, which are adjusted from data in the quarterly census and reflect updated information on business openings and closings, add to evidence that the employment picture in the U.S. is weakening.

Most of the time span for the report came before President Donald Trump took office, indicating the jobs picture was deteriorating before he began levying tariffs against U.S. trading partners.

“The BLS’ preliminary benchmark revisions to nonfarm payrolls show a much weaker labor market over most of 2024 and early 2025 than previously estimated,” said Oren Klachkin, market economist at Nationwide Financial. “Importantly, the slower job creation implies income growth was also on a softer footing even prior to the recent rise in policy uncertainty and economic slowdown we’ve seen since the spring. This should give the Fed more impetus to restart its cutting cycle.”

Tuesday’s revisions are not by themselves a reflection of current conditions as they go back as much as a year and a half. However, recent months’ data also has been pointing to a soft labor market. The summer months of June, July and August saw average payroll growth of just 29,000 per month, below the break-even level for keeping the unemployment rate steady.

More stories

Delayed September report shows U.S. added 119,000 jobs, more than expected; unemployment rate at 4.4%

November 22, 2025

Minneapolis Fed’s Kashkari expects lower interest rates later this year

February 10, 2025

Trump’s pressure on Europe to slap 100% tariffs on India and China raises eyebrows

September 22, 2025

The private sector lost 33,000 jobs in June, badly missing expectations for a 100,000 increase, ADP says

July 2, 2025

The largest markdowns came in leisure and hospitality (-176,000), professional and business services (-158,000) and retail trade (-126,200). Most sectors saw downward revisions, though transportation and warehousing and utilities had small gains. Almost all the revisions were confined to the private sector; government jobs were adjusted down by 31,000.

Stocks reacted little to the release, though Treasury yields erased losses and turned higher.

In addition to the economic concerns, the revisions also bring added heat to the BLS, which has been under fire from the White House for its data collection methods and results.

Following a weak jobs report for July that featured substantial downward revisions, President Donald Trump fired then-BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer and nominated Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni as her successor. However, the August payrolls count was actually lower than July’s and also featured revisions that took down the June total to a loss of 13,000 jobs, the first negative total since December 2020.

“Today, the BLS released the largest downward revision on record proving that President Trump was right: Biden’s economy was a disaster and the BLS is broken,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. “This is exactly why we need new leadership to restore trust and confidence in the BLS’s data on behalf of the financial markets, businesses, policymakers, and families that rely on this data to make major decisions.”

The benchmark revisions differ from the monthly adjustments in that they are far more encompassing.

Where the monthly moves come from additional survey data that comes in to the BLS, the annual revisions stem from more comprehensive information from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages as well as tax data that essentially offers a full do-over on the data, rather than the incremental course corrections of the monthly reports.

Moreover, the numbers announced Tuesday will face further revisions when the BLS releases the final benchmark figure in February 2026.

For the previous benchmark revision, which encompassed the 12 months prior to March 2024, the initial total was 818,000 fewer jobs, later adjusted in February 2025 to 598,000, still the largest downward move since 2009.

As a share of the 171 million member labor force, the revisions amount to 0.6%. However, the political and economic ramifications could be considerable.

Additional signs of labor market weakness will add to the case that Trump has been pressing for Federal Reserve interest rate cuts.

The White House statement added that Fed Chair Jerome Powell “has officially run out of excuses and must cut the rates now.”

Lululemon shares plunge 20% as it slashes earnings outlook, projects $240 million tariff hit
T. Rowe Price shares jump after deal where Goldman will invest $1 billion in asset manager
Related posts
  • Related posts
  • More from author
Economy

Ukraine, trade, pandas: What China’s Xi and France’s Macron discussed in Beijing

December 6, 20250
Economy

Core inflation rate watched by Fed hit 2.8%, delayed September data shows, lower than expected

December 5, 20250
Economy

Layoff announcements top 1.1 million this year, the most since 2020 pandemic, Challenger says

December 4, 20250
Load more
Read also
Finance

London’s answer to Wall Street gains momentum as major firms sign on

December 6, 20250
Economy

Ukraine, trade, pandas: What China’s Xi and France’s Macron discussed in Beijing

December 6, 20250
Earnings

Week in review: Stocks rise, Meta gets real on metaverse, and Salesforce bounces

December 6, 20250
Business

From the California gold rush to Sydney Sweeney: How denim became the most enduring garment in American fashion

December 6, 20250
Finance

Is bitcoin really digital gold? In 2025, the leading crypto has failed to answer that question

December 5, 20250
Economy

Core inflation rate watched by Fed hit 2.8%, delayed September data shows, lower than expected

December 5, 20250
Load more
    © 2022, All Rights Reserved.
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Cookie Law
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions